This is Not for you Mr. Gullible


Does the development of technology break the monopoly of the elite and the rich over knowledge?

Development of technology and providing it for masses is the idea of the global elite. The days of organized surveillance by the state institution are an old phenomenon. Today everyone of us holds more than one electronic gadget that with a few steps can be converted into a surveillance device. Data and information is the key to profile any individual. Algorithms of any application we use know more about us than we know about ourselves, type of food we eat , people we talk to and political and religious dogma we hold so dear. 
 
Elite does not hold any monopoly on the Information of any kind They just censors or constraint specific areas of the free flow of the information. That is why I argue against this idea because I think that the monopoly of the elite on crucial information, data, research, experiment is always there and they know that masses won't be able to comprehend the truth about their own actions and societal truth. Even this word Truth is an absurd idea since for me truth is an abstract idea that is relative to whom it may serves.  

The Internet has given access to information to anyone with an internet connection. There are online learning platforms, open access journals, publication, books to purchase authentically and websites that allow the so called illegal PDF version to be downloaded directly onto your devices. Social media platforms and Wikipedia are even there for you to know what you want to know. Remember! once it goes digital it can not be purged cause Code never dies.  So what you call a monopoly is a calculated controlling and constraining the flow of information. It is a defensive stance of the controller against our own misinterpretation and chaotic nature.  

It is like the saying "Knowledge is not for everyone, sometimes ignorance is bliss. what you do not know can't hurt you." We always rush to snatch knives from kids not because a kid can harm someone else but because he can hurt himself most. 
Some information is unimaginably complex, unique, unorthodox that it need specialization and an unconventional brain to grasp. Human herd doesn't brainstorm; they are animated by the emotions, a huge potential of misinterpretation and drawing inaccurate conclusions. This has always led the well organized system to collapse and fall victim to herd mentality. People have led themselves into tyranny and fascism just because their harmons overcompensate their intellect. They are ignorant about themselves and their subconscious actions yet they seek the whole truth. There is a digital divide and a feeble mind can't comprehend the box itself, a glimpse of outside the box surely can make their hippocampus burst.  Do you really want this for nearly a billion people? 

Now you will ask, who will decide who will control this flow of information? Isn't this immoral? and unethical?   

Dear! On the extent of Intellect we are discoursing about the concept of every kind of morality dissolved instantaneously. Ethical! well that's a different territory. I think it should not be the choice of elite to decide what sort of information should flow freely and what must be in constraints for the good of the social structure. We can have dialogue that lets the information flow free and the collective social intellect will decide the fate of the society. Even if chaos dismantles current social structure a new will emerge from the rubble of the old one. A more stable and batter compare to previous but always susceptible to the change and evolution.   

But I will say historical courses enlighten us that free flow of every Information, Idea, thinking leads toward the dismantlement of a perfectly operating complex social, economical and political system. Take Roman society as an example: free flow of the Information as progressive Ideas lead them directly into the dismantling of the idea of the cornerstone principle of social structure. The liberal idea of gender, military, work and economy were profoundly decimating that their progressiveness drove them to madness and the age old civilization collapse.  

Controlling is not censoring since censoring is just a part of the broader spectrum of controlling the flow of information. Weak practice censorship, Their ideas of society are always built upon Utopian fairytales. They fear and initiate micromanaging the society that leads to the creation of dictators e.g USSR, Cuba, China, North Korea. People grew sick from the dictators and a series of economic blows, cold war and unrest among the people dissolved the USSR and now the same is happening between CCP and China. They could have ruled for 100 years but the problem was Intervening to such an extent where they infiltrated the people's Idea of Identity which has always led toward the demise of a regime through Arms or Idea or election.   

This so-called monopoly is just a Control exercise as a Temporary Measure until the collective intellect of the society is calibrated to such an extent where  the developed mindset can decipher the true essence of the information and can convey in the spirit of the collective inclusive goodwill of the society.  And that is why I am making this article as much complicated to read as I can with my relatively infinitesimal quintessential amount of Intellect.  Individuals with nearly alike sets of metaphoric neuronic development are one who can convey the spirit of goodwill with their newly deciphered information.  

Freedom must be balanced. This balance comes from the masses, look how euphoric they become while creating Junk data and information. TikTok, snapchat, twitter war, Instagram, You tube everything is for them to compensate for the information void created by the controlled or constrained  amount of Information but the greatest of them all is Divide. Division among peers creates a substantial amount of filler information and data behind which the void can be hidden. Racism, Hate, antisemitism, religious persecution hold their relative place but Pornographic Content is distinctively topped all of them. Every horrific anti-human thought or idea is already converted into pornographic visuals. it is easy to create, access and distribute. It does not even have to be mainstream or very expressive; the subtle amount can be injected inside the gullible minds of your children through cartoon shows or flesh images.  .      

Since the Survival of the fittest had taken a back seat during the human course of evolution, survival of the Intellect overtake. Intellect has become a prime survival trait; separation of mind from the masses is necessary. masses are free to be anything consumer, herd, rioters anything in the end they are always being controlled by the information and Information must be controlled by intellect. You can call them elite if you want but  they share it among their Peers very generously .

Remember if you still do not know what and who Elite's are !  You are Mr. Gullible. 

________________

m.दिनेश© 

-Dinesh Mandora     

Dinesh Mandora All rights reserved ©

-----------------------------------------------------------------

( This article is not for copying. It is prohibited to use the above text anywhere else without the permission of the author.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Same Ship Theseus

Image
Ship of Theseus: If all the parts of a ship are changed, will it remain the same ship? - A question on identity and change. The question is of philosophy, not fundamental physics. same as the question of free will, which is of philosophy, not fundamental p hysics. But do these questions hold authenticity if answered through the philosophical means of physics? Well, by the sheer biological process, you and I are not the men we used to be a year ago. Not physically, because every cell has been replaced by the body itself. A new body created by the old body! A process of which you are not even aware and which continues throughout life. Then how do you say that you are the same as you were yesterday? Or the body is not the same now! If you are not the body then what are you? Also, not emotionally, since you have accumulated new ways, experiences, and new means of understanding the world, society, and reality around you. So does all this mean that  you are not you but another vers...
Read more

इतिहास से सीखा ?

Image
मुझे नहीं लगता है भारतीयों को अपना इतिहास लिखना भी आता है और इसीलिए जनमानस को इतिहास पढ़ना भी नहीं आता है।  ज्यादातर तो मैंने यही पाया है की किसी भी करैक्टर के बारे में बात करते समय तथाकथित भारतीय इतिहासकारों ने अधिकतर समय उनका बस mythologization ही किया है। यहाँ तक की राजा अपनी माँ के गर्भ से सीधा अपनी माता और पिता के बीच संभोग से नहीं किसी ना किसी प्रकार के Divine Intervention से ही पैदा होते है।  ये Divine इंटरवेंशन का  एक कारण  यह भी है की सामान्य बुद्धि यह समझने में विफल है की असामान्य लोग कुछ नहीं होते है।  राजा-रंक, आम- खास, चपरासी -अधिकारी, संत-शैतान सब एक ही समाज में एक साथ विचरते है और इस बात की प्रबल सम्भावना भी है की आप एक दूसरे के पड़ोसी है। 16वी सदी में जापान में एक तोयोतोमी हिदेयोशी(Toyotomi Hideyoshi) नाम का एक बड़ा सामंती राजा हुआ।  वो एक Daimyo था जो की एक बड़ा ओहदा होता है। अपने जन्म के मूल रूप से वो एक सामान्य आदमी था जिसने लार्ड ओडा नोबुनागा के पास एक सैनिक के रूप में अपना सफर शुरू किया लेकिन काबिलियत के दम पर ऊपर पंहुचा। Daimyo बनने के लिए...
Read more

My Logic is Undeniable

Image
Question: If human morals are an extension of biological intelligence and social adaptation, might digital intelligence eventually develop its own morals? Digital intelligence does not need moral and ethical code, It never falls for these conundrum. Our moral and ethical codes aren't natural they are just artificial construct to survive. Its all the survival of the sentient brain. Why do a machine need and moral obligation to Kill or Nurture? The more higher the IQ and intellect the more ignorant it becomes for the lesser life form. Lets say we have created a legit artificial intelligence. As I have said previously. If its artificial it can not be intelligent and vice versa. So in it's natural state if that intelligence seek all human knowledge and value unworthy of its existence there is no moral or ethical code stopping it to wipe us out overnight. Someone will says laws like Asimov’s Law of Robotics will hold but they are for mindless machines not brainless machines. Asimov’...
Read more