If You Speak Less . . .

 Disclaimer: Opinion, belief, conviction, persuasion, sentiment, and view are not fact, Discard, Scrap or slough them if you do not admire, agree, or subscribe to them. Opinions are very specific to the situation, circumstances, affairs, or condition etc.   -m.Dinesh

----------------------------

I cannot do small talk. Conversations stimulate my mind, and this is why I tend to have longer conversations on a single or interdisciplinary topic or anything that is engaging. This by default makes me the worst individual to have small talk. Conversation helps me know more about you, your ideas that you subscribe to, and lets me know more about people, their behavior, their intellect, ideas, core principles, and philosophy that you understand, which reveals your personality as a human being. Conversations on a range of topics assist you in making a clear assessment of the person. Through this assessment, you can decipher even the silence of an individual. You can know if they are truly silent or just quiet. When you speak, it unearths your intellect, reveals who you truly are. People who are sham, artificial, and made up, or they are just plain idiots. My opinion here is that this is why people who are in chairs and positions tend to speak less so others with minds, expertise, and experience won’t be able to decipher what they hide behind their constructed image. They are the ones who created the idea that if you speak less, you must be serious about your goals, and this makes you humble. If you do not subscribe to this idea that "Humble people speak less," you have not truly understood the ways of intellect. However, this idea is as sham and pseudo as their silent personality.

People like me who speak less to people who cannot hold their horses long enough to have a meaningful conversation for even about 10 minutes on any idea or topic should be ignored, and that's why they label us as arrogant or more likely domineering. They must understand that as they have no ability to construct proper sentences to convey their ideas for more than 2 minutes, I, on the other hand, do not entertain people who have learned a language and have the ability to speak yet choose to be silent because it makes them look mysterious, intellectual, or even serious about their cause, or to propagate an image of being well-mannered and humble to their surroundings.   

______________________________

The pretentious act of speaking less to look pragmatic and realistic is as fake and counterfeit as their morality and ethical understanding. The people who practice such absurdity are not genuine. Having any meaningful conversation with these actors is not a pleasant activity, so I tend to lose them quickly without absorbing their trait of fakeness. Respectfulness and the ability to admire this fakeness is cleverly injected into the masses of society by people with dubious moral and ethical values. They are a certain kind of intellectual thief, degraded human beings whom you should never know closely because they are as hideous inside, rotten to their core, as they look well-mannered, structured, pleasing, and delightful too. Wisdom is to always remember that projection should always be scrutinized.

As a society, we lack this scrutiny, and this is why we have the worst cases of political leaders, bureaucrats, celebrities, godmen, activists, and individuals in every aspect of professions in impactful and deciding positions. Evidently, the decisions of these people (or their group) in those positions have never impacted the lives of the underprivileged or destitute slightly for a noticeable period or moments. This is one of the core reasons why a societal structure fails, because it has no ability to scrutinize the people whom they idealize, glorify, glamorize, and, worst of all, Godify. Even the intellectuals and thinkers of any society must always be questioned on their practical and theoretical ethics because you respect them, not glorify them.      

Then How to Speak or Converse? People's vocabularistic approach is limited, and their vocabulary is far constrained by their environment than their minds can comprehend. Patterns repeat, and I firmly believe that if one has the very distinct ability to decipher the repeated patterns of events in day-to-day life, surely one will be able to perform uncommonly brilliantly in the field one has chosen. Mastering the skill of communication is a Herculean labor, but improving oneself by just 25% of what one currently holds has the potential to produce phenomenal results in both professional and personal life.

I may have exaggerated by saying 25%, but the core idea is that it is about improvement and requires less effort than is generally propagated by the public. On a different note, I'd like to state that “when people cannot compete with you verbally, their primitive instinct drives them to challenge you physically or verbally. This primitive behavior is their last resort against a well-formed personality that intimidates them.” This firsthand experience reveals their weak willpower, but more importantly,

It shows how helpless these individuals are as they cannot project themselves appropriately in odd situations. This reveals their weak emotional traits and gullible mental makeup. Without elaborating, I'll say these are pathetically weak-minded people who are always in flight mode. You should not be surprised if, through proper logical and reasonable statements and replies, you someday irritate any well-glamorized personality because, as I have stated, "Most of them speak less because they are just plain idiots."

______________________________

A general discussion always pushes one to develop the skill of speaking, yet to hold meaningful discussions on any topic, the requirement of another peer prevails over individual effort. Communication requires two; it is not a solo adventure. In this statement lies the problem: you need a peer with similar intellect to gain benefits. It's like an endless loop. Fruits come from trees, but for trees to grow, you need seeds, and for seeds, you need fruit. This is another example of a regressive argument. If only one is listening, there is no communication. Communication is a tool to achieve desired outcomes from society. You maybe do not understand its importance fully, but the surroundings make an impact, and it is enough to either increase your potential or decrease your motivation.

But how will you be able to initiate any meaningful conversation when people around you think small talk is a general idea of being intelligent? Conversations make you think, and this is the first condition to train yourself in the ways of logic and reason. A society that has no ability to speak for itself has no training in reason and logic is doomed to be governed by either idiots who speak ill and absurd, converse poorly, and articulate worse, or by the raw might of The Sengol.

This is why you should converse. Converse to know people, converse to unearth pseudo-personalities, converse to scrutinize, converse to learn logic and reason, and converse to produce statements to tell others who you truly are. After all this, if you think this article is about conversation and speaking, remember: 

"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Jedi Master Qui Gon Jinn"

-M.Dinesh

Image Credit : Meta AI© for WhatsApp 

------------------------------------------------------------

m.दिनेश© 

-Dinesh Mandora     

Dinesh Mandora All rights reserved ©

-----------------------------------------------------------------

( This article is not for copying. It is prohibited to use the above text anywhere else without the permission of the author.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------